In the late 17th and early 18th centuries, Margaret Duncan, a widowed merchant’s wife residing in Glasgow, found herself entangled in one of the many witch trials that swept across Scotland. A woman of middling socioeconomic status, Margaret was called into question when accused of witchcraft by two young women, Margaret Laird of Paisley and Margaret Murdoch of Govan. Both accusers claimed to suffer from fits and other torments, which they attributed to the machinations of witches. During these episodes, the young women alleged the involvement of numerous individuals, including Margaret Duncan, leading to widespread concern and action.
The ensuing judicial proceedings drew considerable attention. Extensive testimony was gathered from witnesses who claimed to have observed the strange fits and listened to the vehement accusations of Laird and Murdoch. The testimonies were compiled during separate sessions in April 1699, with declarations taken in Paisley and Glasgow. Subsequently, Margaret was called to trial in Edinburgh in December 1700. Despite the serious nature of the charges, the trial culminated in her release; records indicate that the anticipated proceedings scheduled for May 1699 in Glasgow did not occur, and ultimately, the high court deserted the diet.
Margaret Duncan's case reflects the turbulent and precarious nature of life during the Scottish witch trials. Her release serves as a testament to the complexities and challenges faced by those caught in the fervor of witchcraft accusations, a period marked by fear, suspicion, and the intricate dynamics of community testimony and legal adjudication. Her story provides insight into the broader societal and judicial processes of early modern Scotland, where allegations could disrupt lives and leave lasting impacts on individuals and communities alike.