In the annals of Scotland's witch trials, the case of John Black of Berwick in 1683 remains an enigma noted more for its absence in historical records than its proceedings. Living during a time of heightened fear and suspicion surrounding witchcraft, John found himself implicated in a case marked by significant gaps in documentation, leaving much about his experience and the allegations against him uncertain. Lacking comprehensive details, the known references suggest that he may have been accused in connection with practices relating to "charming," a term often associated with folk healing or the use of magic for benevolent purposes—activities that, depending on the era and severity of local beliefs, could result in suspicion and legal action.
The record of John's case appears primarily through references in Larner et al.'s 'Source-book,' suggesting it was processed to be heard at a circuit court, as indicated by its inclusion on the porteous roll. The porteous roll signified lists of cases intended for upcoming court sessions. However, due to the absence of substantial documentation, including final case outcomes, the exact nature of his trial remains elusive. The scant information suggests that the case may not have reached a definitive conclusion, or at least one that has been preserved in the accessible historical record. John Black's case serves as a reminder of the many stories partially told or forever lost in the complexities of Scotland’s legal and judicial history during the witch trials era.