Murray,Issobell

Case Reference: C/EGD/1324

Case Summary
Case RefC/EGD/1324
AccusedIssobell Murray
Case Start Date8/6/1649
Case Date2/7/1649
Common NameMurray,Issobell
Characterization
TypePrimarySecondary
Unorthodox Religious Practice
Demonic
Implicated by Another
Not Enough Info

Notes: Named by another witch but confessed to demonic pact. From her confession and those of the others there also seems to have been some unorthodox religious elements associated with Easter practices.

Devil PresentYes
Communal SexNo
Devil WorshipYes
Food and DrinkNo
DancingYes
SingingYes

Notes: Met during the first week of Pasche at or about one hour after midnight. Another meeting was week after Pasche at 10 o'clock at night. Another meeting was at 'Butter dam' location not known

Meeting Places
PlaceLocationInversion
House yardPainstonNo
LochPainstonNo
DamButter DamNo

Confessed she had been a servant of the devil since the previous Easter (Pasche).

TypeText
Servant
Devil's Marknip on left shoulder
Anti-baptism
New nameLisbie
Sexwith a rough (ruch) man all black
Devil Appearances
TypeText
Animal Devilblack dog

Elphane/Fairyland
Food/Drink
Verbal Formulae
Ritual Acts
Familiars
Shape Changing
Dreams/Visions
Unorthodox Religious Practice
Sympathetic Magic
Riding Dead
Shape Changing
TypeDetails
Animalcat

  • Easter

NameTitleInvolvementNotes
John Ayton Investigatorlater commissioner
William Baillie Laird of LamingtonCommissioner
James Borthwick Investigator
George Cockburn Investigator
John Cockburn Mr of ClerkingtonInvestigator
John Cockburn Mr of ClerkingtonCommissioner
Patrick Dausone Investigator
George Gray Investigator
Patrick Inglis of ElvingstonCommissioner
William Trent MrInvestigator
Patrick Young Investigatorlater commissioner

SourceReferenceNotes
RPC2nd series, viii, 191-3.Details of confession recorded in RPC which lists other witches and their meetings.
Haddington Presbytery recordsCH2/185/6, p. 50.Note in presbytery that suspect had confessed.
APSVol 6, part 2, p 732-3.
RPC2nd S, v8 pp. 193-4
Trials (1)
Trial RefDateYearVerdictSentenceExecution
T/JO/94 No